The AI Skill Companies Are Missing Is One Operations Managers Already Have

OperationsCareers editorial team · 7 July 2026 · 5 min read · Source: McKinsey Global Survey data
An operations manager reviewing process flow diagrams on control room screens
88%
of organisations now use AI
21%
have redesigned any workflow around it
3x
high performers more likely to redesign work

Nearly nine in ten organisations now use AI somewhere in the business. Very few are getting real value from it. The difference is not the technology. It is whether anyone redesigned the work around it — and that is an operations skill.

The 21% problem

McKinsey's latest State of AI research puts a number on something operations people have sensed for a while. AI adoption is close to universal. Redesigning the work around AI is not. Most organisations have added AI on top of processes designed for a world without it.

Adoption is everywhere. Redesign is rare. Use AI in at least one function 88% Fundamentally redesigned any workflow 21%
Organisations using AI vs organisations that have fundamentally redesigned at least some workflows. Source: McKinsey State of AI, Global Survey.

That gap shows up in the results. McKinsey identifies a small group of AI high performers — roughly 6% of organisations — that attribute meaningful bottom-line impact to AI. High performers are nearly three times as likely to have fundamentally redesigned individual workflows. In McKinsey's analysis of 31 organisational practices, intentional workflow redesign made one of the strongest contributions to real business impact.

The differentiator is process work

Not model selection. Not prompt libraries. Not which vendor won the pilot. The practice that most separates organisations getting value from AI is the deliberate redesign of how work flows: what gets automated, what gets escalated, where a human checks the output, and how exceptions are handled.

There is a name for the person who maps processes, finds the handoffs that break, decides where controls sit, and redesigns the flow. That person is an operations manager. This has been the operations toolkit for decades. The AI era has not made it obsolete. It has made it the scarcest input to AI success.

Where the humans belong

One more data point deserves attention: defined human-in-the-loop validation. High performers know exactly when and how AI output gets checked by a person. Most organisations do not.

Defined processes for human validation of AI output AI high performers 65% Everyone else 23%
Share of organisations with defined processes for when AI outputs need human validation. Source: McKinsey State of AI, Global Survey.

Deciding where the human belongs in a process is judgment work. It requires knowing which errors are recoverable, which steps carry regulatory weight, and where a wrong output causes downstream damage. In finance operations, our editorial line applies: AI drafts the narrative, never the ledger. In HR operations: AI assists, never decides the hire. Drawing those lines, function by function, is exactly the work the data says organisations are failing to do.

Where is your organisation?

One tap, anonymous. Results appear after you vote.

What to do with this

The encouraging conclusion: organisations do not have too few AI tools. They have too few people who can rebuild work around them. Operations professionals are closer to that role than anyone else in the building.

Know someone this applies to? Share it

The OperationsCareers Briefing covers what AI actually changes in operations work, function by function. The latest issue is free for subscribers.

Get the Briefing

Sources

McKinsey & Company, The State of AI: Agents, Innovation, and Transformation (Global Survey, 1,993 respondents, 105 nations) — adoption, high-performer, workflow redesign, and human-validation findings.

McKinsey & Company, The State of AI: How Organizations Are Rewiring to Capture Value — workflow redesign share among organisations using gen AI.